Logic-Philosophical Studies 14:98-122 (2016)

Authors
Jens Lemanski
Fernuniversität Hagen
Abstract
From the beginning of the 16th century to the end of the 18th century, there were not less than ten philosophers who focused extensively on Venn’s ostensible analytical diagrams, as noted by modern historians of logic (Venn, Gardner, Baron, Coumet et al.). But what was the reason for early modern philosophers to use logic or analytical diagrams? Among modern historians of logic one can find two theses which are closely connected to each other: M. Gardner states that since the Middle Ages certain logic diagrams were used just in order to teach “dull-witted students”. Therefore, logic diagrams were just a means to an end. According to P. Bernhard, the appreciation of logic diagrams had not started prior to the 1960s, therefore the fact that logic diagrams become an end the point of research arose very late. The paper will focus on the question whether logic resp. analytical diagrams were just means in the history of (early) modern logic or not. In contrast to Gardner, I will argue that logic diagrams were not only used as a tool for “dull-witted students”, but rather as a tool used by didactic reformers in early modern logic. In predating Bernhard’s thesis, I will argue that in the 1820s logic diagrams had already become a value in themselves in Arthur Schopenhauer’s lectures on logic, especially in proof theory.
Keywords logic diagrams  Euler diagrams  foundations of logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Periods in the Use of Euler-Type Diagrams.Jens Lemanski - 2017 - Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum 5 (1):50-69.
Lewis Carroll's Visual Logic.Francine F. Abeles - 2007 - History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (1):1-17.
Logic and Visual Information.Eric Hammer - 1995 - CSLI Publications.
The Semiotics of Spider Diagrams.James Burton & John Howse - 2017 - Logica Universalis 11 (2):177-204.
Diagrams, Logic and Representation.Eric Morgan Hammer - 1995 - Dissertation, Indiana University
Peirce and the Logical Status of Diagrams.Sun-Joo Shin - 1994 - History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (1):45-68.
How Diagrams Can Support Syllogistic Reasoning: An Experimental Study.Yuri Sato & Koji Mineshima - 2015 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 24 (4):409-455.
Logic Machines and Diagrams.Martin Gardner - 1958 - University of Chicago Press.
Towards a Model Theory of Diagrams.Hammer Eric & Danner Norman - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (5):463 - 482.
Visualizations of the Square of Opposition.Peter Bernhard - 2008 - Logica Universalis 2 (1):31-41.
Euler’s Visual Logic.Eric M. Hammer & Sun-Joo Shin - 1998 - History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (1):1-29.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-29

Total views
200 ( #57,153 of 2,499,205 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #20,978 of 2,499,205 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes