Abstract

Avtor najprej izpostavlja prelomnico, ki jo je povzročila objava dela La crisi della ragione leta 1979, nakar se zaustavlja pri zborniku Il pensiero debole iz leta 1983 – ki je dolgo desetletje vžigal debate v italijanski filozofiji – ter pri razlikah med Vattimovimi in Rovattijevimi stališči, ki sta zbornik uredila. Vattimo, dedič Pareysonove hermenevtike, razvija svoje pojmovanje o pošibitvi metafizičnih zahtev po resnici ob pomoči ontološkega naziranja zadnjega Heideggra. Pri Rovattiju pa je nasprotno izrazito prisotna Pacijeva fenomenologija, kar ga napotuje k temu, da interpretira pošibitev misli kot iskanje novega izoblikovanja vprašanja subjektivnosti.The author first presents the turning point caused by the publication of the work La crisi della ragione in 1979 and then concentrates on the collection Il pensiero debole from 1983 – which stirred vivid debates in Italian philosophy for a decade – and on the differences between Vattimo’s and Rovatti’s views, both editors of the collection. Vattimo, the heir of Pareyson’s hermeneutics, develops his notion of the weakening of metaphysical claims for truth through the ontological view of late Heidegger. Rovatti, on the other hand, shows evidence of a strong presence of Paci’s phenomenology, which directs him toward interpreting the weakening of thought as the quest for the new formation of the question of subjectivity