Lexico-grammatical alignment in metaphor construal

Cognitive Linguistics 30 (1):165-203 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study concerns the distribution of metaphorical lexis in discrete syntactic constructions. Source and target seed language from established conceptual metaphors in economic discourse is used to catalogue the specific patterns of how metaphorical pairs align in five syntactic constructions: A-NP, N-N, NP-of-NP, V-NP, and X is Y. Utilizing the Corpus of Contemporary American English, the examination includes 12 frequent metaphorical target triggers combined with 84 source triggers to produce 2,016 ordered collocations, i.e. investment freeze and turbulent market. Through detailed type and token counts, results confirm that source domains function as conceptual material used to structure the target domain and disproportionally fill syntactic positions associated with predication, Studies in cognitive corpus linguistics. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Publishers; Sullivan, Karen. 2013. Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing). Given a lexeme’s origin – source or target – when used in source-target metaphors, syntactic alignment can be predicted, market climate is metaphorical, climate market is not. Exceptions to these strong tendencies are explained through genre-specific lexicalization processes in which predicate denoting terms like bubble establish themselves as domain modifiers in economic jargon. Through quantitative techniques to gage metaphorical conventionality and lexical versatility, corpus methodology is used to define and inform the value of frequency effects in cataloguing and understanding metaphorical lexicalization.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Levels of metaphor.Zoltán Kövecses - 2017 - Cognitive Linguistics 28 (2):321-347.
Objects of metaphor.Samuel D. Guttenplan - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
What Is `Cognitive' About Cognitive Linguistics?Steven Fesmire - 1994 - Metaphor and Symbol 9 (2):149-154.
Functional syntax: anaphora, discourse, and empathy.Susumu Kuno - 1987 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Syntax is more diverse, and evolutionary linguistics is already here.William Croft - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5):453-454.
Structure-Mapping in Metaphor Comprehension.Phillip Wolff & Dedre Gentner - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (8):1456-1488.
Usage-based linguistics and the magic number four.Clarence Green - 2017 - Cognitive Linguistics 28 (2):209-237.
The Languages of the Law: An Integrated View From Vico and Conceptual Metaphor Theory. [REVIEW]Marcel Danesi - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (1):95-106.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-13

Downloads
14 (#990,520)

6 months
3 (#976,558)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?