Subception: fact or artifact? a reply to Eriksen

Psychological Review 63 (5):343-347 (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,697

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Subception: Fact or artifact?Charles W. Eriksen - 1956 - Psychological Review 63 (1):74-80.
An experimental analysis of subception.C. W. Eriksen - 1956 - American Journal of Psychology 69:625-34.
Artifact Categorization. Trends and Problems.Massimiliano Carrara & Daria Mingardo - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (3):351-373.
Anomaly versus artifact, or anomalous artifact?Marcello Truzzi - 1987 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4):614.
A statistical theory of the phenomenon of subception.Davis Howes - 1954 - Psychological Review 61 (2):98-110.
The weapons effect: Fact or artifact?Delwin D. Cahoon & Ed M. Edmonds - 1985 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (1):57-60.
Artifact Categorization and the Modal Theory of Artifact Function.Bence Nanay - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (3):515-526.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
7 (#1,052,864)

6 months
3 (#244,731)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Logic of Tacit Inference.Michael Polanyi - 1966 - Philosophy 41 (155):1 - 18.
Fechner as a pioneering theorist of unconscious cognition.David Romand - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1):562-572.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references