Basic concept of inborn errors and defects of steroid biosynthesis

The Eugenics Review 59 (1):55 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Garrod's “inborn errors of metabolism.”.H. Lehmann - 1964 - The Eugenics Review 56 (2):108.
Steroid receptors in biology and medicine molecular endocrinology and steroid hormone action (1989). Edited by G. H. Sato and J. L. Stevens, Alan R. Liss: New York. [REVIEW]Robin Leake - 1990 - Bioessays 12 (9):453-454.
Inborn errors of GABA metabolism.Kenneth M. Gibson, William L. Nyhan & Jaak Jaeken - 1986 - Bioessays 4 (1):24-27.
Francis Galton: and eugenics today.D. J. Galton & C. J. Galton - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (2):99-105.
Evidence for treatable inborn errors of metabolism in a cohort of 187 Greek patients with autism spectrum disorder.Martha Spilioti, Athanasios E. Evangeliou, Despoina Tramma, Zoe Theodoridou, Spyridon Metaxas, Eleni Michailidi, Eleni Bonti, Helen Frysira, A. Haidopoulou, Despoina Asprangathou, Aggelos J. Tsalkidis, Panagiotis Kardaras, Ron A. Wevers, Cornelis Jakobs & K. Michael Gibson - 2013 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.
H. Fabre.Excerpta Medica - 1965 - The Eugenics Review 57:21.
Meiotic defects in human oocytes: Potential causes and clinical implications.Tianyu Wu, Hao Gu, Yuxi Luo, Lei Wang & Qing Sang - 2022 - Bioessays 44 (12):2200135.
Perception of the postural vertical in normals and subjects with labyrinthine defects.Brant Clark & Ashton Graybiel - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (5):490.
"Prejudice" H.-G. Gadamer and "Paradigm" T. Kuna.K. Vergeles - 2012 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 2 (22):42-46.
In Whose Image? G. K. Chesterton’s and C. S. Lewis’s Response to the Eugenics Movement.Julie Carlson - 2014 - The Chesterton Review 40 (1/2):77-97.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-11

Downloads
6 (#1,480,551)

6 months
2 (#1,446,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references