- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Expert accountability: What does it mean, why is it challenging—and is it what we need?
Constellations 31 (1):98-113 (2022)
Abstract
Constellations, EarlyView.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
To walk the walk: Why we need to make things personal in public deliberation.Markus Holdo & Zohreh Khoban - forthcoming - Constellations.
Dialectical Aristotelianism: On Marx's account of what separates us from the animals.Tom Whyman - forthcoming - Constellations.
What is asylum? More than protection, less than citizenship.Nanda Oudejans - 2020 - Constellations 27 (3):524-539.
“What would I do?”: Political action under oppression in Arendt.Alzbeta Hajkova - forthcoming - Constellations.
What may we hope for? Education in times of climate change.Ingerid S. Straume - 2020 - Constellations 27 (3):540-552.
If Foucault, why not Rawls? On enlarging the critical tent.Alessandro Ferrara - 2023 - Constellations 30 (4):401-405.
What the dictum really meant—and what it could mean for us.Jan-Werner Müller - 2018 - Constellations 25 (2):196-206.
The seven veils of paranoia, or, why does the paranoiac need two fathers?Slavoj ZŽIŽZek - 1996 - Constellations 3 (2):139-156.
The seven veils of paranoia, or, why does the paranoiac need two fathers?Slavoj Zizek - 1996 - Constellations 3 (2):139-156.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-10-03
Downloads
16 (#227,957)
6 months
14 (#987,135)
2022-10-03
Downloads
16 (#227,957)
6 months
14 (#987,135)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Experts: which ones should you trust?Alvin I. Goldman - 2011 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. New York: Oxford University Press.
Scientists as experts: A distinct role?Torbjørn Gundersen - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 69:52-59.
Balancing epistemic quality and equal participation in a system approach to deliberative democracy.Simone Chambers - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (3):266-276.
Public deliberation and the fact of expertise: making experts accountable.Cathrine Holst & Anders Molander - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (3):235-250.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-7g5mb uwo