Shelby L. Langer, Joan M. Romano, Francis Keefe, Donald H. Baucom, Timothy Strauman, Karen L. Syrjala, Niall Bolger, John Burns, Jonathan B. Bricker, Michael Todd, Brian R. W. Baucom, Melanie S. Fischer, Neeta Ghosh, Julie Gralow, Veena Shankaran, S. Yousuf Zafar, Kelly Westbrook, Karena Leo, Katherine Ramos, Danielle M. Weber & Laura S. Porter
Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2022)
AbstractCancer and its treatment pose challenges that affect not only patients but also their significant others, including intimate partners. Accumulating evidence suggests that couples’ ability to communicate effectively plays a major role in the psychological adjustment of both individuals and the quality of their relationship. Two key conceptual models have been proposed to account for how couple communication impacts psychological and relationship adjustment: the social-cognitive processing model and the relationship intimacy model. These models posit different mechanisms and outcomes, and thus have different implications for intervention. The purpose of this project is to test and compare the utility of these models using comprehensive and methodologically rigorous methods. Aims are: to examine the overall fit of the SCP and RI models in explaining patient and partner psychological and relationship adjustment as they occur on a day-to-day basis and over the course of 1 year; to examine the fit of the models for different subgroups ; and to examine the utility of various methods of assessing communication by examining the degree to which baseline indices from different measurement strategies predict self-reported adjustment at 1-year follow up. The study employs a longitudinal, multi-method approach to examining communication processes including: standard self-report questionnaires assessing process and outcome variables collected quarterly over the course of 1 year; smartphone-based ecological momentary assessments to sample participant reports in real time; and laboratory-based couple conversations from which we derive observational measures of communicative behavior and affective expression, as well as vocal indices of emotional arousal. Participants are patients with stage II-IV breast, colon, rectal, or lung cancer and their spouses/partners, recruited from two NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers. Results will be published in scientific journals, presented at scientific conferences, and conveyed to a larger audience through infographics and social media outlets. Findings will inform theory, measurement, and the design and implementation of efficacious interventions aimed at optimizing both patient and partner well-being.
Similar books and articles
Links Between Communication and Relationship Satisfaction Among Patients With Cancer and Their Spouses: Results of a Fourteen-Day Smartphone-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.Shelby L. Langer, Joan M. Romano, Michael Todd, Timothy J. Strauman, Francis J. Keefe, Karen L. Syrjala, Jonathan B. Bricker, Neeta Ghosh, John W. Burns, Niall Bolger, Blair K. Puleo, Julie R. Gralow, Veena Shankaran, Kelly Westbrook, S. Yousuf Zafar & Laura S. Porter - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
A communication algorithm for teamwork in multi-agent environments.Egon van Baars & Rineke Verbrugge - 2009 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 19 (4):431-461.
Breaking Bad News Protocol for Cancer Disclosure: An Iranian Version.Parvaneh Abazari, Fariba Taleghani, Simin Hematti, Azadeh Malekian, Fariborz Mokarian, Sayyed Mohammad Reza Hakimian & Maryam Ehsani - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine 10.
Communication Protocols with Belief Messages.Ryuichiro Ishikawa - 2006 - Theory and Decision 61 (1):63-74.
The influence of the entourage on the couple relationship. How religious living improves the life of the couple.Mihaela Luminita Sandu - 2018 - Dialogo 5 (1):41-49.
The need for multi-method approaches in empirical legal research.Laura Beth Nielsen - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
The importance of faith in couple communication.Mariana Floricica Calin - 2018 - Dialogo 5 (1):89-96.
Communication Emerging? On Simulating Structural Coupling in Multiple Contingency.M. Füllsack - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):103-110.
Optimism and well-being: a prospective multi-method and multi-dimensional examination of optimism as a resilience factor following the occurrence of stressful life events.Evan M. Kleiman, Alexandra M. Chiara, Richard T. Liu, Shari G. Jager-Hyman, Jimmy Y. Choi & Lauren B. Alloy - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (2).
Randomized feasible interpolation and monotone circuits with a local oracle.Jan Krajíček - 2018 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 18 (2):1850012.
Optimal Feedback Control of Cancer Chemotherapy Using Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman Equation.Yong Dam Jeong, Kwang Su Kim, Yunil Roh, Sooyoun Choi, Shingo Iwami & Il Hyo Jung - 2022 - Complexity 2022:1-11.
Public administration as a political-communication process: the symbolic aspect.E. Mamontova - 2013 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 3 (23):135-140.
Cancer and Maybe a Baby?Ezekiel J. Emanuel & Kathleen Powderly - 1994 - Hastings Center Report 24 (6):24-25.
Family consent, communication, and advance directives for cancer disclosure: a Japanese case and discussion.A. Akabayashi, M. D. Fetters & T. S. Elwyn - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (4):296-301.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads