An Evidence-Hierarchical Decision Aid for Ranking in Evidence-Based Medici

In Barbara Osimani & Adam La Caze (eds.), Uncertainty in Pharmacology: Epistemology, Methods and Decisions. Cham: Springer. pp. 231-259 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter addresses the problem of ranking available drugs in guideline development to support clinicians in their work. Based on a pragmatic approach to the notion of evidence and a hierarchical view on different kinds of evidence this chapter introduces a decision aid, HiDAD, which draws on the multi criteria decision making literature. This decision aid implements the wide-spread intuition that there are different kinds of evidence with varying degrees of importance by relying on a strict ordinal ordering of kinds of evidence. In order to construct a ranking every pair of drugs is first compared separately on all kinds of evidence. Next, these quantitative comparisons are then aggregated into an overall comparison between drugs based on all the available evidence in a way which avoids that evidence of less importance is trumped by evidence of the higher levels. Finally, these overall comparisons are used to determine the final ranking of drugs which then informs the process of guideline writing. Properties, modifications and applicability of the decision aid HiDAD are discussed and assessed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evidence of Evidence as Higher Order Evidence.Anna-Maria A. Eder & Peter Brössel - 2019 - In Mattias Skipper & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.), Higher-Order Evidence: New Essays. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 62-83.
External validity: the neglected dimension in evidence ranking.Navindra Persaud & Muhammad M. Mamdani - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (4):450-453.
What is mechanistic evidence, and why do we need it for evidence-based policy?Caterina Marchionni & Samuli Reijula - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 73:54-63.
Evidence-based medicine and ethics: a practical approach.P. Vineis - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):126-130.
Evidence: philosophy of science meets medicine.John Worrall - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):356-362.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-22

Downloads
17 (#854,714)

6 months
9 (#295,942)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jürgen Landes
Università degli Studi di Milano

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1954 - Wiley Publications in Statistics.
A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.Glenn Shafer - 1976 - Princeton University Press.
The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1956 - Philosophy of Science 23 (2):166-166.
The philosophy of evidence-based medicine.Jeremy H. Howick - 2011 - Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, BMJ Books.

View all 30 references / Add more references