British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (3):287-306 (2010)

Kendall Walton's ‘Categories of Art’ is one of the most famous and, arguably, most important papers in modern aesthetics. Despite this, and the various references to it and discussions of it within the literature, there are no general commentaries on this essay. In addition to outlining a general framework for approaching the article, I identify and explicate the two main exegetical issues regarding it. The first concerns how to understand Walton's main thesis that the aesthetic character of artworks is determined, in part, by their ‘correct category’. I suggest that the traditional interpretation of Walton's proposal is mistaken, and defend an alternative view at length. The second issue concerns the relationship between Walton's view and competing accounts of the aesthetics of artworks. Here I suggest that Walton's position is unique, contrasting the views of both typical formalists, on the one hand, and ordinary contextualists, on the other, in philosophically significant ways. Careful reflection on this particular issue helps reveal some very important distinctions among aesthetic theories, which have not been previously drawn or emphasized.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/aesthj/ayq017
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,307
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Categories of Literature.Stacie Friend - 2020 - Wiley: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (1).
“Categories of Art” for Contextualists.David Davies - 2020 - Wiley: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (1):75-79.
“Categories of Art” for Contextualists.David Davies - 2020 - Wiley: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (1):75-79.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kendall Walton's 'Categories of Art': A Critical Commentary.Brian Laetz - 2010 - British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (3):287-306.
Walton on Fictionality.Richard Woodward - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (12):825-836.
Category Independent Aesthetic Experience: The Case of Wine.David Sackris - 2013 - Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (1-2):111-120.
Fictionality and Imagination, Revisited.Lee Walters - 2017 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (1):15-21.
In Defence of Moderate Aesthetic Formalism.Nick Zangwill - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201):476-493.
Imaginatively‐Colored Perception: Walton on Pictorial Experience.Alon Chasid - 2016 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 54 (1):27-47.
Taking Twofoldness Seriously: Walton on Imagination and Depiction.Bence Nanay - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (3):285–289.
Fiction-Making as a Gricean Illocutionary Type.Manuel Garcia-Carpintero - 2007 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (2):203–216.
Categories and Intentions: A Reply.Kendall L. Walton - 1973 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 32 (2):267-268.
Fictionality and Photography.Richard Woodward - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (3):279-289.
Thoughts on the 'Paradox' of Fiction.Kathleen Stock - 2006 - Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics 3 (2):59-65.


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #270,021 of 2,507,717 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,849 of 2,507,717 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes