K(in)Vulnerability: Indigenous and Anthropocene Perspectives on Kin and Vulnerability

In Elodie Boublil & Susi Ferrarello (eds.), The Vulnerability of the Human World: Well-being, Health, Technology and the Environment. Springer Verlag. pp. 111-122 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his chapter, Gerard Kuperus explores kinship and vulnerability partially formulated within the context of the Turtle Island myth. In the myth and the cultures based on it, we are always seen in relationships to the non-human world, not as masters, but rather as dependent agents. Kinship with the natural world is central. In the modern Western mindset, on the other hand, we have attempted to make ourselves into beings that are not vulnerable. We see the non-human world as consisting of passive entities ready to be manipulated while giving ourselves a strong sense of agency in the form of mastery. In this modern mindset we seem to have a fear of losing this invulnerability. Thus, we remain strong, we think, by not recognizing kinship with the natural world. If a forest is seen as our kin, we would mourn the loss of that forest. We might avoid such mourning by making sure no one would hurt our own relatives. The chapter suggests that the ultimate challenge of the Anthropocene (or rather to get out of it) is to make ourselves more vulnerable. Kinship is not only making oneself vulnerable, it also makes one invulnerable. A personified world of natural entities transforms our sense of vulnerability and will lead us to step beyond the dichotomy of vulnerability and invulnerability.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vulnerability.Daniel Burghardt & Jörg Zirfas - 2023 - In Nathanaël Wallenhorst & Christoph Wulf (eds.), Handbook of the Anthropocene. Springer. pp. 1565-1568.
A Pedagogy of Vulnerability.Stefan Bengtsson - 2019 - In Jonas Andreasen Lysgaard, Stefan Bengtsson & Martin Hauberg-Lund Laugesen (eds.), Dark Pedagogy: Education, Horror and the Anthropocene. Springer Verlag.
Vulnerability as a Regulatory Category in Human Subject Research.Carl H. Coleman - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):12-18.
Vulnerability, Insecurity and the Pathologies of Trust and Distrust.Catriona Mackenzie - 2020 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies:624-643.
Introduction.Wendy Rogers - 2012 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):1-10.
How Do We Respond? Embodied Vulnerability and Forms of Responsiveness.Danielle Petherbridge - 2018 - In Clara Fischer & Luna Dolezal (eds.), New Feminist Perspectives on Embodiment. London, New York: Palgrave MacMillan. pp. 57-79.
Animal Vulnerability and its Ethical Implications: An Exploration.Angela K. Martin - 2019 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (2):196-216.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-23

Downloads
1 (#1,903,274)

6 months
1 (#1,475,652)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gerard Kuperus
University of San Francisco

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references