Verstehen, Einfühlen and Mental Simulation: Reply to Anne Ruth Mackor

Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84:Verstehen, Einfühlen and Mental (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Erklären, verstehen and simulation: Reconsidering the role of empathy in the social sciences.Anne Ruth Mackor - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):237-262.
Rechtvaardigheid, barmhartigheid en empathie.Anne Ruth Mackor - 2001 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 93 (1):69-70.
Orgaandonatie: de kosten en de baten. Een antwoord aan Anne Ruth Mackor.G. A. den Hartogh - 2004 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 96:293-301.
Hilary Bok over vrijheid als concept van de praktische rede.Anne Ruth Mackor - 2011 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 103 (3):206-210.
Is Language a Game?Gail Soffer - 1994 - Études Phénoménologiques 10 (20):27-63.
Reply to 'the scope and limit of mental simulation'.Jérôme Dokic - 2002 - In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins.
Reply to Simulation Theory and Mental Concepts.William Child - 2002 - In Jerome Dokic & Joelle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-16

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references