The “reign of error” in social psychology: On the real versus imagined consequences of problem-focused research

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):349-350 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Krueger & Funder (K&F) make the familiar accusation that social psychologists focus too much on what people do wrong, rather than on what they do right. Although there is some truth to their charge, their accusations are overstated and their conclusions are incorrect. The field is far less problem-focused than they suggest, and the proposed consequences of this approach are more imagined than real.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The wrong standard: Science, not politics, needed.Kenneth R. Hammond - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):341-341.
From disorder to coherence in social psychology.Todd K. Shackelford & Robin R. Vallacher - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):356-356.
Building an even better conceptual foundation.Tatsuya Kameda & Reid Hastie - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):345-346.
But what would a balanced approach look like?David Dunning - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):332-333.
Balance in psychological research: The dual process perspective.Keith E. Stanovich - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):357-358.
The goodness of judgment index.Lee Jussim - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):344-345.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
25 (#621,327)

6 months
10 (#382,620)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references