Conscience and Synderesis in John Mair’s Philosophical Theology

In John T. Slotemaker & Jeffrey Witt (eds.), A Companion to the Theology of John Mair. Boston: Brill. pp. 175-193 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his discussions on the psychology of moral judgement, Mair appears as a follower of the via moderna in the footsteps of Gabriel Biel. However, his refinements of, and even conscious disagreement with the Bielian position reveals a degree of originality in his thinking. In all of this, Mair seemed to be interested in the problems of moral psychology throughout his career and endeavoured to find satisfactory solutions even if some remained open to further questions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

John Mikhail on Moral Intuitions.Florian Demont-Biaggi - 2013 - Kairos. Revista de Filosofia and Ciência 7.
John Mair.Henrik Lagerlund - 2011 - In H. Lagerlund (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer. pp. 625--626.
Conscience and synderesis.Tobias Hoffmann - 2011 - In Brian Davies & Eleonore Stump (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Aquinas. New York: Oxford University Press.
John Mair on Semantic Paradoxes.Miroslav Hanke - 2013 - Studia Neoaristotelica 10 (1):50-87.
John Mair on Semantic Paradoxes.Miroslav Hanke - 2012 - Studia Neoaristotelica 9 (2):154-183.
John Mair on Semantic Paradoxes.Miroslav Hanke - 2012 - Studia Neoaristotelica 9 (2):154-183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-17

Downloads
15 (#244,896)

6 months
3 (#1,723,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pekka Kärkkäinen
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references