The “hearts-and-minds frame”: Not all i-frame interventions are ineffective, but education-based interventions can be particularly bad

&
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e166 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pitting i-frame policies against s-frame policies inadvertently propagates a false dichotomy that fails to distinguish between effective i-frame policies that directly change behaviors and ineffective education-based i-frame policies that try to change people's hearts and minds. We argue that people's fixation on changing hearts and minds may be an obstacle for behavioral science in policy.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x23001036

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

i-Frame interventions enhance s-frame interventions.Jiaying Zhao & Frances S. Chen - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e180.
Expectations, opportunities, and awareness: A case for combining i- and s-frame interventions.Ben R. Newell, Samuel Vigouroux & Harry Greenwell - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e170.
An inconvenient truth: Difficult problems rarely have easy solutions.Christina A. Roberto - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e173.
Moving from i-frame to s-frame focus in equity, diversity, and inclusion research, practice, and policy.Joyce C. He & Sonia K. Kang - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e159.
Why a group-level analysis is essential for effective public policy: The case for a g-frame.William J. Bingley, S. Alexander Haslam, Catherine Haslam, Matthew J. Hornsey & Frank Mols - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e148.
Optimizing behavior change through integration of individual- and system-level intervention approaches.Martin S. Hagger & Kyra Hamilton - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e157.
Where next for behavioral public policy?Nick Chater & George Loewenstein - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e181.
What’s the Problem with the Frame Problem?Sheldon J. Chow - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (2):309-331.
Frame Based Formulas for Intermediate Logics.Nick Bezhanishvili - 2008 - Studia Logica 90 (2):139-159.
The frame problem and the treatment of prediction.Mark Sprevak - 2005 - In L. Magnani & R. Dossena (eds.), Computing, Philosophy and Cognition. pp. 4--349.
The i-frame and the s-frame: How focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray.Nick Chater & George Loewenstein - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e147.
Connectionism, systematicity, and the frame problem.W. F. G. Haselager & J. F. H. Van Rappard - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (2):161-179.
A Rotating Quantum Vacuum.V. A. De Lorenci & N. F. Svaiter - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (8):1233-1264.
The frame problem and theories of belief.Scott Hendricks - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 129 (2):317-33.
The Dramatic True Story of the Frame Default.Vladimir Lifschitz - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (2):163-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-31

Downloads
7 (#1,379,256)

6 months
6 (#509,125)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references