Penrose's metalogical argument is unsound

In James Ladyman, Stuart Presnell, Gordon McCabe, Michał Eckstein & Sebastian J. Szybka (eds.), Road to reality with Roger Penrose. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Remarks on Penrose’s “New Argument”.Per Lindström - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (3):231-237.
A Note on the Lucas Argument.Rudy Rucker - 2020 - Studia Semiotyczne 34 (1):81-82.
Yesterday’s Algorithm: Penrose and the Gödel Argument.William Seager - 2003 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (9):265-273.
Mechanism, truth, and Penrose's new argument.Stewart Shapiro - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (1):19-42.
Penrose's new argument.Per Lindström - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (3):241-250.
Penrose and mathematical ability.William S. Robinson - 1992 - Analysis 52 (2):80-88.
The Incompleteness And The Argument Lucas-penrose.Virgil DrĂghici - 2001 - Studia Philosophica 1.
On the Anti-Mechanist Arguments Based on Gödel’s Theorem.Stanisław Krajewski - 2020 - Studia Semiotyczne 34 (1):9-56.
Setting the scene: The claim and the issues.Roger Penrose - 1992 - In D. Broadbent (ed.), The Simulation of Human Intelligence. Blackwell.
The Gödelian Argument: Turn over the Page.John R. Lucas - 2003 - Etica E Politica 5 (1):1.
Minds, Machines, And Mathematics A Review of Shadows of the Mind by Roger Penrose. [REVIEW]David J. Chalmers - 1995 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 2:11-20.
Metalogical Decorations of Logical Diagrams.Lorenz Demey & Hans Smessaert - 2016 - Logica Universalis 10 (2-3):233-292.
On the Question of Whether the Mind Can Be Mechanized, II: Penrose’s New Argument.Peter Koellner - 2018 - Journal of Philosophy 115 (9):453-484.
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation.Christian Dahlman & Thomas Bustamante (eds.) - unknown - Cham: Imprint: Springer.
On the Nature of Mathematical Judgement Reply to Penrose.Alan Bundy & Roger Penrose - 1990 - Edinburgh University.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-16

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stanislaw Krajewski
University of Warsaw

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references