Contemporary History of Cosmology and the Controversy over the Multiverse

Annals of Science 66 (4):529-551 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Summary Cosmology has always been different from other areas of the natural sciences. Although an observationally supported standard model of the universe emerged in the 1960s, more speculative models and conceptions continued to attract attention. During the last decade, ideas of multiple universes (the ‘multiverse’) based on anthropic reasoning have become very popular among cosmologists and theoretical physicists. This had led to a major debate within the scientific community of the epistemic standards of modern cosmology. Is the multiverse a scientific hypothesis, or is it rather a philosophical speculation disguised as science? This paper offers a review of the recent and still ongoing controversy concerning the multiverse, emphasizing its foundational nature and relation to philosophical issues. It also compares the multiverse controversy to some earlier episodes in the history of twentieth-century cosmology when particular theories and approaches came under attack for betraying the ideals of proper science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fine Tuning Explained? Multiverses and Cellular Automata.Francisco José Soler Gil & Manuel Alfonseca - 2013 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 44 (1):153-172.
Review of H Kragh (1996) Cosmology and Controversy. [REVIEW]Graham Oppy - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (3):387-9.
A Natural Model of the Multiverse Axioms.Victoria Gitman & Joel David Hamkins - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (4):475-484.
The set-theoretic multiverse.Joel David Hamkins - 2012 - Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (3):416-449.
Is Human History Predestined in Wang Fuzhi’s Cosmology?Jeeloo Liu - 2001 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 28 (3):321–338.
Cosmic Agnosticism.Timothy E. Eastman - 2007 - Process Studies 36 (2):181-197.
Cosmology and political culture in early China.Aihe Wang - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-22

Downloads
149 (#126,413)

6 months
24 (#116,937)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Beyond Falsifiability: Normal Science in a Multiverse.Sean M. Carroll - 2019 - In Dawid Richard, Dardashti Radin & Thebault Karim (eds.), Epistemology of Fundamental Physics: Why Trust a Theory? Cambridge University Press.
Many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics.Lev Vaidman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Testability and epistemic shifts in modern cosmology.Helge Kragh - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (1):48-56.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Falsificationism falsified.Sven Ove Hansson - 2006 - Foundations of Science 11 (3):275-286.
Falsification and Demarcation in Astronomy and Cosmology.Benjamin Sovacool - 2005 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 25 (1):53-62.
Is physical cosmology a science?G. J. Whitrow & H. Bondi - 1953 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (16):271-283.
Anthropic reasoning.Martin J. Rees - 1997 - Complexity 3 (1):17-21.

View all 7 references / Add more references