- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Conjoint-measurement analysis of composition rules in psychology
Psychological Review 78 (2):151-169 (1971)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
An exchange on functional and conjoint measurement: Reply.David H. Krantz & Amos Tversky - 1971 - Psychological Review 78 (5):458-458.
An exchange on functional and conjoint measurement: Reply.David H. Krantz & Amos Tversky - 1971 - Psychological Review 78 (5):457-458.
Additive conjoint measurement with respect to a pair of orderings.A. A. J. Marley - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (2):215-222.
A Relevance Constraint on Composition.David Vander Laan - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):135-145.
An alternative "fundamental" axiomatization of multiplicative power relations among three variables.A. A. J. Marley - 1968 - Philosophy of Science 35 (2):185-186.
A review of the fundamental concepts of measurement. [REVIEW]Ludwik Finkelstein - 1984 - Measurement 2 (1):25-34.
A new perspective on cross-cultural ethical evaluations: The use of conjoint analysis. [REVIEW]John Tsalikis, Bruce Seaton & Petros Tomaras - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 35 (4):281 - 292.
Lexicographic additivity for multi-attribute preferences on finite sets.Yutaka Nakamura - 1997 - Theory and Decision 42 (1):1-19.
GP preferences for information systems: conjoint analysis of speed, reliability, access and users.Jeremy C. Wyatt, Richard P. Batley & Justin Keen - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (5):911-915.
Conjoint Measurement.R. Duncan Luce - 1978 - In A. Hooker, J. J. Leach & E. F. McClennen (eds.), Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory. D. Reidel. pp. 311--336.
An exchange on functional and conjoint measurement: Reply.Norman H. Anderson - 1971 - Psychological Review 78 (5):458-458.
An exchange on functional and conjoint measurement: Comment.Norman H. Anderson - 1971 - Psychological Review 78 (5):457-457.
Random conjoint measurement and loudness summation.Jean-Claude Falmagne - 1976 - Psychological Review 83 (1):65-79.
Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I: Additive and Polynomial Representations.David Krantz, Duncan Luce, Patrick Suppes & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 1971 - New York Academic Press.
Foundations of Measurement, Vol. III: Representation, Axiomatization, and Invariance.Duncan Luce, David Krantz, Patrick Suppes & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 1990 - New York Academic Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
29 (#550,291)
6 months
12 (#213,237)
2016-06-30
Downloads
29 (#550,291)
6 months
12 (#213,237)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Do central nonlinearities exist?William R. Uttal - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):286-286.
Do mental events have durations?Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):277-278.
Task-dependent intensity/duration effects in mental chronometry.Gerald S. Wasserman - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):290-302.
From neurophysiology to perception.Richard M. Warren - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):288-288.
Can a theory based on some cell properties define the timing of mental activities?B. Libet - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):270-271.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-wg6s5 uwo