THE EUROPEAN UNION’S DIGITAL COPYRIGHT LAW REVIEW: MERIT THROUGH PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Western Australian Student Law Review 5 (1):33-57 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A multilevel consultative approach to governmental decision-making is increasingly being adopted in the European Union. On the back of this shift, it is prudent to consider the use of such consultative approaches in reforming digital copyright law. The adoption of a multilevel consultative approach has the potential to significantly benefit European Member States and increase political integration in Europe. Such an approach can address the complex dispersion of power amongst different levels of public institutions in the European Union and support effective decision-making. The 2014 Charter for Multilevel Governance (‘Charter’) established a sophisticated governance framework to enhance operational and institutional cooperation and decision-making mechanisms among European Member States. Subsequently, the Charter and the concept of multilevel consultation formed an important facet of the European Union’s review of copyright regulation. The objective of this article is to evaluate the merits of a multilevel consultative approach by analysing its use in the European Union digital copyright law review process.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Private use as fair use: is it fair?F. S. Grodzinsky & M. C. Bottis - 2007 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 37 (2):11-24.
Wired Shut, Copyright and the Shape of Digital Culture. [REVIEW]Tarleton Gillespie - 2009 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 7 (2/3):213-218.
The privatization of information policy.Niva Elkin-Koren - 2000 - Ethics and Information Technology 2 (4):201-209.
Ethics in the Digital Domain.Robert S. Fortner - 2020 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Sharing is caring vs. stealing is wrong: a moral argument for limiting copyright protection.Julian Hauser - 2017 - International Journal of Technology Policy and Law 3 (1):68-85.
What Is a Copyright Work?Brad Sherman - 2011 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 12 (1):99-121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-23

Downloads
180 (#111,579)

6 months
65 (#76,988)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references