The concept of Datenherrschaft of patient information from a Heideggerian perspective

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 17 (3):336-353 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

PurposeIn this paper, patient information is approached from a Heideggerian perspective with the intention to gather an understanding about the personal nature of the information. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the ownership of patient information and then present Datenherrschaft as a suitable model for patient ownership of patient information.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is theoretical in approach. It is based on arguments derived from Heidegger’s work in the Being and Time.FindingsBased on this Heideggerian approcah, a proposal for using the special definition of ownership of patient information – Datenherrschaft – given to a patient is suggested. From a Heideggerian perspective, it can be stated that the patient has the strongest rights towards patient information because this information is crucial for a patient to have an understanding about their Dasein.Research limitations/implicationsDatenherrschaft is used as an example of an ethically justified way of regulating the patient information ownership and should be analysed further. Especially the practical implications of implementing Datenherrschaft need more research.Originality/valuePatient information ownership is an issue that is neither unambiguously solved in many countries, nor has it, in our view, been ethically justified. The potential solution – Datenherrschaft – presented in this paper is clear and has strong philosophical justifications.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Risks of Absolute Medical Confidentiality.M. A. Crook - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):107-122.
The Gettier Problem in informed consent.S. Cohen - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (11):642-645.
The Impact of Web 2.0 on the Doctor-Patient Relationship.Bernard Lo & Lindsay Parham - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (1):17-26.
Secreto, lenguaje y memoria en la sociedad de la información.Rafael Capurro & Raquel Capurro - 2012 - International Review of Information Ethics 17:3-14.
Rethinking the concept of the right to information privacy: a Japanese perspective.Kiyoshi Murata & Yohko Orito - 2008 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 6 (3):233-245.
The concept of lack in Martin Heidegger.Alfredo de la Torre - 2007 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 7:48-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-16

Downloads
10 (#1,168,820)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Heidegger on being a person.John Haugeland - 1982 - Noûs 16 (1):15-26.
Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
Situation and Limitation: Making Sense of Heidegger on Thrownness.Katherine Withy - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):61-81.
Subjectivity: Locating the first-person in being and time.Steven Crowell - 2001 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 44 (4):433 – 454.

View all 13 references / Add more references