- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Evolutionary epistemology is self-referentially inconsistent
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (3):449-450 (1982)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
The Justification of Scientific Change. By Carl R. Kordig. Dordrecht: D. Reidel; New York: Humanities Press, 1971. Pp. xiv, 119. $11.00. [REVIEW]William R. Shea - 1972 - Dialogue 11 (3):464-465.
Carl R. Hausman, "Charles S. Peirce's Evolutionary Epistemology". [REVIEW]Vincent Michael Colapietro - 1994 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (4):682.
Karl R. Popper's "Objective Knowledge, An Evolutionary Approach". [REVIEW]Harry Ruja - 1973 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34 (2):278.
On the observability of the self.Roderick Chisholm - 1969 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30 (September):7-21.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
47 (#329,645)
6 months
10 (#382,620)
2009-01-28
Downloads
47 (#329,645)
6 months
10 (#382,620)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-sqlzn uwo