- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--A model and taxonomy
Psychological Review 97 (2):253-270 (1990)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
"Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--A model and taxonomy": Correction to Kornblum et al.Sylvan Kornblum, Thierry Hasbroucq & Allen Osman - 1992 - Psychological Review 99 (1):44-44.
Multidimensional vector model of stimulus–response compatibility.Motonori Yamaguchi & Robert W. Proctor - 2012 - Psychological Review 119 (2):272-303.
Cognitive versus stimulus-response theories of learning.Kenneth W. Spence - 1950 - Psychological Review 57 (3):159-172.
S-R compatibility and information reduction.Paul M. Fitts & Irving Biederman - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (4):408.
Stimulus discriminability and S-R compatibility: Evidence for independent effects in choice reaction time.Irving Biederman & Robert Kaplan - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (3):434.
Comments on Broadbent's response bias model for stimulus recognition.Lloyd H. Nakatani - 1970 - Psychological Review 77 (6):574-576.
Stimulus and response generalization: Deduction of the generalization gradient from a trace model.Roger N. Shepard - 1958 - Psychological Review 65 (4):242-256.
Stimulus and response generalization: Tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space.Roger N. Shepard - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (6):509.
Amount and locus of stimulus-response overlap in paired-associate acquisition.Douglas L. Nelson & Richard M. Garland - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (2):297.
Effects of stimulus uncertainty and S-R compatibility on speed of digit coding.Louis D. Costa, Morton Horwitz & Herbert G. Vaughan - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (6):895.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
23 (#705,261)
6 months
6 (#587,779)
2016-06-30
Downloads
23 (#705,261)
6 months
6 (#587,779)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Representing others' actions: just like one's own?Natalie Sebanz, Günther Knoblich & Wolfgang Prinz - 2003 - Cognition 88 (3):B11-B21.
Are Automatic Conceptual Cores the Gold Standard of Semantic Processing? The Context‐Dependence of Spatial Meaning in Grounded Congruency Effects.Lauren A. M. Lebois, Christine D. Wilson-Mendenhall & Lawrence W. Barsalou - 2015 - Cognitive Science 39 (8):1764-1801.
Are "implicit" attitudes unconscious?Bertram Gawronski, Wilhelm Hofmann & Christopher J. Wilbur - 2006 - Consciousness and Cognition 15 (3):485-499.
Unconscious modulation of the conscious experience of voluntary control.Katrin Linser & Thomas Goschke - 2007 - Cognition 104 (3):459-475.
Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account.Tristan Lavender & Bernhard Hommel - 2007 - Cognition and Emotion 21 (6):1270-1296.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-x7cz5 uwo