The ends of Philosophy of Religion: Terminus and Telos

New York: Palgrave-Macmillan (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Knepper criticizes existing efforts in the philosophy of religion for being out of step with, and therefore useless to, the academic study of religion, then forwards a new program for philosophy of religion that is in step with, and therefore useful to, the academic study of religion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Religion and Hume's legacy.D. Z. Phillips & Timothy Tessin (eds.) - 1999 - New York: St. Martin's Press, Scholarly and Reference Division.
What is Philosophy of Religion? The Nature of Philosophy of Religion.A. Asgari Yazdi - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 12 (48):135-146.
A Conception of the Philosophy of Religion.Piotr Moskal - 2008 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 56 (1):221-237.
Religionsphilosophie.Sebastian Gäb - 2022 - Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Divine subjectivity: understanding Hegel's philosophy of religion.Dale M. Schlitt - 1990 - [Scranton, PA]: University of Scranton Press.
Philosophy of Religion: A Very Short Introduction.Tim Bayne - 2018 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Telos and Terminus.Stefano Franchi - 1998 - Idealistic Studies 28 (1-2):35-46.
Telos and Terminus.Stefano Franchi - 1998 - Idealistic Studies 28 (1-2):35-46.
One nation, under gods: a new American history.Peter Manseau - 2015 - New York: Little, Brown and Company.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-20

Downloads
11 (#1,128,105)

6 months
5 (#629,992)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tim Knepper
Drake University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references