Intended models and the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem

Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (4):475-489 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Remarks on Finite Löwenheim‐Skolem Theorems.Martin Grohe - 1996 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 42 (1):569-571.
There is no recursive link between the k-size of a model and its cardinality.R. Barker - 2002 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 118 (3):235-247.
Skolem's Paradox.Timothy Bays - 2012 - In Peter Adamson (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A note on extensions of infinitary logic.Saharon Shelah & Jouko Väänänen - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (1):63-69.
The Skolem-löwenheim theorem in toposes.Marek Zawadowski - 1983 - Studia Logica 42 (4):461 - 475.
A Proof of the Skolem-Löwenheim Theorem.H. Rasiowa & R. Sikorski - 1953 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 18 (4):339-340.
The Philosophical Impact of the Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem.Miloš Arsenijević - 2012 - In Majda Trobok Nenad Miščević & Berislav Žarnić (eds.), Between Logic and Reality. Springer. pp. 59--81.
A Löwenheim‐Skolem Theorem for Inner Product Spaces.Wilfried Meissner - 1982 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 28 (33‐38):549-556.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
80 (#208,741)

6 months
1 (#1,469,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references