Concepts, Intuitions, and Hypotheses

Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):352-354 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Conflatingion with Empirical Observation: The False Mind-Matter Dichotomy” by Bernardo Kastrup. Upshot: In this comment I formulate two questions. The first concerns the role and nature of concepts and intuitions; the second is about the status of the “existence of objective matter” as a “hypothesis” or “explanatory model.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mind is an Abstraction.Chris Fields - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):350-352.
Conflating the Concept with the Thing.Itay Shani - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):348-350.
Is Speaking of Mind or Matter a Matter of Choice?Konrad Werner - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):355-356.
Epistemology, Metaphysics and the Preconditions of Science.Robert Prentner - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):354-355.
On Detection and Attribution.H. von Storch - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):131-132.
Quality and Qualifications.G. Zeeuw - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):138-139.
New Concepts or Just Re-Wording?Filipo Studzinski Perotto - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (2):293-295.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-12

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references