PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:394 - 405 (1982)
AbstractThe cognitive gain in the use of metaphor and simile is nicely elucidated by Tversky's theory of similarity. The features of the theory which are of special importance are the directionality and context-dependency of similarity judgments. These indicate the extent to which such judgments are classificatory and that similarity is not only the cause of an object's classification but is also a derivative of groupings. Metaphor and simile exploit certain cognitive features involved in the relation between classification, context and similarity judgments so as to make possible the creation of similarity, which, from a conceptual standpoint, is the prime motivation for metaphor.
Similar books and articles
Similarity After Goodman.Lieven Decock & Igor Douven - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (1):61-75.
Opposites Detract: Why Rules and Similarity Should Not Be Viewed as Opposite Ends of a Continuum.Gary Marcus - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):28-29.
A Critique of the Similarity Space Theory of Concepts.Christopher Gauker - 2007 - Mind and Language 22 (4):317–345.
In Search of Radical Similarity.Oscar Vilarroya - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):35-35.
Abduction and Metaphor: An Inquiry Into Common Cognitive Mechanism. [REVIEW]Cihua Xu & Hengwei Li - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):480-491.
The Rules Versus Similarity Distinction.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
The Changes of Metaphor in Arabic Literature.Miklós Maróth - 2002 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 12 (2):241-255.
Similarity and Induction.Matthew Weber & Daniel Osherson - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2):245-264.
Similarity and Dimensional Analysis (Preprint - Entry in Handbook of Philosophy of Science, Elsevier).S. G. Sterrett - 2009 - In Anthonie W. M. Meijers (ed.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science.
Similarity Involving Attributes and Relations: Judgments of Similarity and Difference Are Not Inverses.D. L. Medin, R. L. Goldstone & D. Gentner - 1990 - Psychological Science 1:64-69.
Preferring Rules to Similarity: Coherence, Goals, and Commitment.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):37-49.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Metaphor, ignorance and the sentiment of (ir)rationality.Francesca Ervas - 2021 - Synthese.
Evidence, Defeasibility, and Metaphors in Diagnosis and Diagnosis Communication.Pietro Salis & Francesca Ervas - 2021 - Topoi 40 (2):327–341.
References found in this work
No references found.