Bayle on the Rights of Conscience

Philosophy Research Archives 11:1-39 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a critical study of the arguments of Pierre Bayle’s Commentaire philosophique by which he tries to show that someone whose conscience is in error has a moral right (of a limited kind) to do what it commands, and that the act may be morally good; and that others, such as the government, may nevertheless have the right, and a duty, to prevent the act by force.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Conscience Principle.Mark C. Murphy - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:387-407.
Reading Bayle.Thomas M. Lennon - 1999 - Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
What is conscience and why is respect for it so important?Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):135-149.
The real significance of Bayle's authorship of the Avis.Michael W. Hickson & Thomas M. Lennon - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):191 – 205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
31 (#513,686)

6 months
9 (#302,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references