The Agent–Structure Debate and America's Vietnam Options: A Reply to Professor Gavan Duffy

Japanese Journal of Political Science 3 (1):1-23 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article responds to Gavan Duffy's critique of AnalogiesatWar in his recent essay on the agent-structure debate in the JJPS (2001, 2: 161giving structure its duestructure” with process, perceptual, and personality variables; (3) misinterprets my assumptions while neglecting the findings of recent works that corroborate the findings of AnalogiesatWar; and (4) fails to demonstrate one of his key suggestions, i.e. the importance of showing how agents and structures are mutually constitutive. The article concludes by discussing some pointers raised by the exchange for furthering the agent-structure debate

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Give Structure Its Due: Political Agency and the Vietnam Commitment Decisions.Gavan Duffy - 2001 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 2 (2):161-175.
What is structure?Robert L. Causey - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):441-462.
Representing the Structure of a Debate.Maralee Harrell - 2022 - Argumentation 36 (4):595-610.
Reclaiming two concepts of liberty.Gideon Elford - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (3):228-246.
Mapping the Structure of Debate.Jeff Yoshimi - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
24 (#155,087)

6 months
6 (#1,472,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references