The equivalence of neo-darwinism and walrasian equilibrium: In defense of organismus economicus

Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):229-248 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Neo-Darwinism is based on the same principles as the Walrasian analysis of equilibrium. This may be surprising for evolutionary economists who resort to neo-Darwinism as a result of their dissatisfaction with Walrasian economics. As it is well-known, the principle of rationality does not play a role in neo-Darwinism. In fact, the whole (neo-)Darwinian agenda became popular exactly because it expunged the idea of rationality from nature, and hence, from equilibrium. It is less known, however, that the rationality principle is also not central in Walrasian equilibrium analysis. Therefore, if we find that the rationality principle must be central to the analysis of decision making of human and nonhuman organisms, we must advance organomics . Organomics is bioeconomics understood as the use of rational choice to the study of the behavior of human and nonhuman organisms. Organomics offers a different starting point than the one offered by neo-Darwinism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Mastodon in the room: how Darwinian is neo-Darwinism?Daniel R. Brooks - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (1):82-88.
The uncertain foundation of neo-Darwinism: metaphysical and epistemological pluralism in the evolutionary synthesis.Richard G. Delisle - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (2):119-132.
Human Nature after Neo-Darwinism.Jos de Mul - 2017 - Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 1 (1):5-17.
Darwinism and Neo‐Darwinism.James G. Lennox - 2008 - In Sahorta Sarkar & Anya Plutynski (eds.), Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Blackwell. pp. 77–98.
The rebirth of rational morphology.David Resnik - 1994 - Acta Biotheoretica 42 (1):1-14.
Economic Darwinism.Birgitte Sloth & Hans Jørgen Whitta-Jacobsen - 2011 - Theory and Decision 70 (3):385-398.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-10-10

Downloads
48 (#322,980)

6 months
5 (#837,573)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Are Plants Rational?Elias L. Khalil - 2010 - Biological Theory 5 (1):53-66.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex.Michael T. Ghiselin - 1976 - Journal of the History of Biology 9 (2):324-324.
Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life.David L. Hull - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):435-438.
Social Choice and Individual Values.Irving M. Copi - 1952 - Science and Society 16 (2):181-181.
Social Choice and Individual Values.Kenneth Joseph Arrow - 1951 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley: New York.

View all 14 references / Add more references