in Defense Of Positive Relevance: A Reply To Peter Achinstein

Florida Philosophical Review 11 (1):26-35 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Discussion note: Positive relevance defended.Sherrilyn Roush† - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (1):110-116.
Achinstein on Semantic Relevance.Michael Martin - 1973 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):77 - 87.
Peter Achinstein, The Book of Evidence. [REVIEW]Dan Mcarthur - 2003 - Philosophy in Review 23:235-237.
Carnap and Achinstein on evidence.Frederick M. Kronz - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 67 (2):151 - 167.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-23

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron Kenna
University of Utah

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references