The right to remain silent: before and after Joan of Arc

Speculum 68 (4):992-1026 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The beginning of the typical Miranda warning—“You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you in a court of law”—is also a fair statement of the medieval right to silence that can be deduced from the canonical rules of due process, and such a warning could and should have been given to arrestees in inquisitorial proceedings. In such proceedings the judge was obliged to give any detained or summoned person a precise statement of the charged crime, to explain the nature of the charges, to allow or provide counsel and other defenses, and to prove that the person was considered guilty of the crime by respectable members of the community before insisting on a response to the charges or to any questioning. If the judge ignored these preliminary procedures and proceeded to interrogation, and persisted even after protest, the defendant could refuse to cooperate by declaring himself or herself aggrieved and entering an immediate appeal

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The silent intermediary: Thoughts of a translator.Joan Tate - 1995 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 6 (2):90-94.
May'68, the emotional month.Joan Copjec - 2006 - In Slavoj Žižek (ed.), Lacan: The Silent Partners. Verso. pp. 90--114.
The Right to Remain Silent.Joseph Greenberg - 2000 - Theory and Decision 48 (2):193-204.
Foundations and the Supreme Court.Joan Roelofs - 1984 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1984 (62):59-87.
Silent Music.Andrew Kania - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (4):343-353.
He is there and He is not silent.Francis August Schaeffer - 1972 - Wheaton, Ill.,: Tyndale House Publishers.
Silent Reading and Conceptual Confusion.James McGray - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Research 38:323-332.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-30

Downloads
17 (#865,183)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references