St. Thomas and the Meaning and Use of “Substance” and “Prime Matter”

New Scholasticism 40 (2):177-189 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00286621

DOI

10.5840/newscholas196640225

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

“Subject,” “Substance,” and “Accident” in St. Thomas.Matthew J. Kelly - 1976 - New Scholasticism 50 (2):232-236.
St. Anselm and St. Thomas.Edward L. Rousseau - 1980 - New Scholasticism 54 (1):1-24.
St. Anselm and St. Thomas.Edward L. Rousseau - 1980 - New Scholasticism 54 (1):1-24.
Prime Matter and Barrington Jones.William Brenner - 1976 - New Scholasticism 50 (2):223-228.
St. Albert and St. Thomas Aquinas.[author unknown] - 1943 - New Scholasticism 17 (1):87-92.
St. Thomas as Teacher.John A. Oesterle - 1965 - New Scholasticism 39 (4):451-466.
St. Thomas Aquinas. [REVIEW]F. A. Walsh - 1935 - New Scholasticism 9 (1):91-92.
Prime Matter, Barrington Jones, and William Brenner.Lewis S. Ford - 1976 - New Scholasticism 50 (2):229-231.
Was St. Thomas a Philosopher?James F. Anderson - 1964 - New Scholasticism 38 (4):435-444.
St. Thomas and the Possibles.Lawrence Dewan - 1979 - New Scholasticism 53 (1):76-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
2 (#1,450,151)

6 months
25 (#616,935)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references