Empirical Elements in Mathematicians' Proofs

International Logic Review 4:191 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What Do Mathematicians Want? Probabilistic Proofs and the Epistemic Goals of Mathematicians.Don Fallis - 2002 - Logique Et Analyse 45.
Beauty Is Not Simplicity: An Analysis of Mathematicians' Proof Appraisals.Matthew Inglis & Andrew Aberdein - 2015 - Philosophia Mathematica 23 (1):87-109.
Why do mathematicians re-prove theorems?John W. Dawson Jr - 2006 - Philosophia Mathematica 14 (3):269-286.
Probabilistic proofs and transferability.Kenny Easwaran - 2009 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (3):341-362.
On Mathematicians' Different Standards When Evaluating Elementary Proofs.Matthew Inglis, Juan Pablo Mejia-Ramos, Keith Weber & Lara Alcock - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (2):270-282.
Non-Formal Properties of Real Mathematical Proofs.Jean Paul van Bendegem - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:249-254.
A Critique of a Formalist-Mechanist Version of the Justification of Arguments in Mathematicians' Proof Practices.Yehuda Rav - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (3):291-320.
Aspects of Mathematical Explanation: Symmetry, Unity, and Salience.Marc Lange - 2014 - Philosophical Review 123 (4):485-531.
Vigre Lectures.Harvey M. Friedman - unknown
Of Proofs, Mathematicians, and Computers.Astrik Yepremyan - unknown
Best-Path Theorem Proving: Compiling Derivations.Martin Frické Frické - 2012 - In James Maclaurin (ed.), Rationis Defensor.
On Relativistic Elements of Reality.Louis Marchildon - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (9):804-817.
That We See That Some Diagrammatic Proofs Are Perfectly Rigorous.Jody Azzouni - 2013 - Philosophia Mathematica 21 (3):323-338.
Why do informal proofs conform to formal norms?Jody Azzouni - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):9-26.
The Collatz conjecture. A case study in mathematical problem solving.Jean Paul Van Bendegem - 2005 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 14 (1):7-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references