Research on Cognitively Impaired Adults

In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford handbook of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The preeminence of informed consent in human subjects protections reflects Western democratic societies' ethical and political commitments to secure each citizen against both coercive and paternalistic influences of other people. Society permits adults extensive personal discretion in choices such as where to live, what to eat, how to dress, and whether to be in research. In short, individuals are afforded extensive discretion in choosing what to do and what is in their own best interests. Informed consent to enroll in research is especially important because research necessarily involves procedures such as randomization and blinding that are done to assure that the project will produce generalizable knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Letters.R. Dresser - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 34 (3):4-4.
Rawls and research on cognitively impaired patients: A reply to Maio.Derek R. Bell - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (5):381-393.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-03

Downloads
9 (#1,249,590)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references