The Preventative Knowledge and Experience of Anesthesiology Students with C-arm Fluoroscopy

European Journal of Therapeutics 29 (2):201-207 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Objective: Long-term C-arm fluoroscopy exposes medical personnel to substantial radiation doses. Preventing this exposure requires protective equipment and radiation safety. This study examined anesthesia students' using fluoroscopy and preventive knowledge. Methods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study included 139 Vocational High School Anesthesia students. The "Healthcare Professional Knowledge of Radiation Protection" scale and a 13-question survey collected data. The scale was designed with a Likert scale and three sub-factors. If the total and sub-dimension item average score of the scale is below 5, it indicates that the level of knowledge of radiation protection among medical personnel is low, and if it is above 5, it indicates that the level of knowledge is high. Results: More than half of the students (59.8%) heard the radiation from the fluoroscopy device, the vast majority (82.7%) did not receive radiation protection training, 58.3% stayed away from the device while it was operating, and 70.5% stated that it is crucial to stay away from the device while it was operating. It was determined that there was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) in the "Radiation Physics, Biology, and Radiation Usage Principles" sub-dimension of students who were male, in their second year of education, received radiation protection training, and offered reliable answers to a number of questions measuring their level of radiation knowledge. In addition, the research revealed a positive and highly significant correlation between the scale and its subdimensions. Conclusion: Although the scale scores of the students who received radiation protection training and had a high level of radiation knowledge were substantially higher than those of the other students, the average score of the students was less than 5. This indicates that students have an inadequate understanding of radiation protection. To prevent the negative biological effects of radiation on the human body, it is necessary to conduct epidemiological research, educate health care professionals and anesthesiology students about the effects and processes of this radiation on human cells, and provide frequent training. Radiation, radiation's biological effects, and radiation protection should be included in health students' curricula.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Radiation Risk in Cold War Mexico: Local and Global Networks.Ana Barahona - 2022 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 30 (2):245-270.
Ethical aspects of radiation protection.Per Wikman-Svahn - 2006 - Dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
Ethical Issues of Radiation Use in Medicine.David S. Dinhofer & Subrata Saha - 2013 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 4 (2):165-181.
Radiation Protection—Sorting Out the Arguments.Sven Ove Hansson - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (3):363-368.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-20

Downloads
179 (#110,727)

6 months
104 (#51,452)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Betul Kaplan
University of Zürich

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references