Strong Connexivity

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):141-145 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Connexive logics aim to capture important logical intuitions, intuitions that can be traced back to antiquity. However, the requirements that are imposed on connexive logic are actually not enough to do justice to these intuitions, as I will argue. I will suggest how these demands should be strengthened

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-01

Downloads
18 (#860,222)

6 months
110 (#43,570)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Humble Connexivity.Andreas Kapsner - 2019 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 28.
Semantics for Pure Theories of Connexive Implication.Yale Weiss - 2022 - Review of Symbolic Logic 15 (3):591-606.
Connexive logic.Heinrich Wansing - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Connexive implication.Storrs Mccall - 1966 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (3):415-433.
A propositional logic with subjunctive conditionals.R. B. Angell - 1962 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 27 (3):327-343.
The Logic of Conditional Negation.John Cantwell - 2008 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 49 (3):245-260.
Advances in Modal Logic.Edwin D. Mares - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):95-97.

Add more references