Aristotle's Definition of Moral Virtue, and Plato's Account of Justice in the Soul

Philosophy 9 (34):168-181 (1934)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nicolai Hartmann, in an interesting discussion of Aristotle’s account of moral virtue, has called attention to the difference between the contrariety of opposed vices and the contrast of certain virtues. The äκρa or extremes, somewhere between which Aristotle thought that any morally virtuous disposition must lie, are not conciliable. The same man cannot combine or reconcile, in the same action, cowardice and bravery, intemperance and insensibility, stinginess and thriftlessness, passion and lack of spirit. These are pairs of contraries, between which a virtue lies; but the virtue is not a synthesis of the extremes in a pair.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Essays in ancient and modern philosophy.Horace William Brindley Joseph - 1935 - Freeport, N.Y.,: Books for Libraries Press.
Review of Gottlieb, The Virtue of Aristotle’s Ethics. [REVIEW]Thornton C. Lockwood Jr - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):418-420.
Aristotle’s Ordinary versus Kant’s Revisionist De nition of Virtue as Habit.L. Hughes Cox - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 12:17-23.
Virtue ethics and virtue epistemology.Roger Crisp - 2010 - In Heather D. Battaly (ed.), Virtue and Vice, Moral and Epistemic. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 21–38.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
39 (#397,178)

6 months
7 (#592,867)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references