Philosophical Questions and Opportunities at the Intersection of Neuroscience, Education, and Research

In Ann Chinnery, Nuraan Davids, Naomi Hodgson, Kai Horsthemke, Viktor Johansson, Dirk Willem Postma, Claudia W. Ruitenberg, Paul Smeyers, Christiane Thompson, Joris Vlieghe, Hanan Alexander, Joop Berding, Charles Bingham, Michael Bonnett, David Bridges, Malte Brinkmann, Brian A. Brown, Carsten Bünger, Nicholas C. Burbules, Rita Casale, M. Victoria Costa, Brian Coyne, Renato Huarte Cuéllar, Stefaan E. Cuypers, Johan Dahlbeck, Suzanne de Castell, Doret de Ruyter, Samantha Deane, Sarah J. DesRoches, Eduardo Duarte, Denise Egéa, Penny Enslin, Oren Ergas, Lynn Fendler, Sheron Fraser-Burgess, Norm Friesen, Amanda Fulford, Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Stefan Herbrechter, Chris Higgins, Pádraig Hogan, Katariina Holma, Liz Jackson, Ronald B. Jacobson, Jennifer Jenson, Kerstin Jergus, Clarence W. Joldersma, Mark E. Jonas, Zdenko Kodelja, Wendy Kohli, Anna Kouppanou, Heikki A. Kovalainen, Lesley Le Grange, David Lewin, Tyson E. Lewis, Gerard Lum, Niclas Månsson, Christopher Martin & Jan Masschelein (eds.), International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 1261-1278 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Education is a fertile ground for neuroscientific applications. However, at the scholarly level this has predominantly been addressed by cognitive psychology and the emerging field of neuroeducation. Although in its very early stages, there is also now a nascent interest by philosophers of education with respect to the intersections of neuroscience, education, and research. The chapter uses neuroscience to provide phenomena for philosophy of education to think and ask questions about, while remaining philosophical and educational. The chapter begins with a survey of the various ways of critical philosophical engagement with neuroscience’s and neuroeducation’s empirical literature, including suggested improvements on the concepts and ideas that frame the neuroscience-education intersection. This includes neuromyths, commercialization, neuroimaging, scientific reductionism, and technological enhancements. It then surveys the opposite direction, where engagement with neuroscience unsettles familiar philosophical concepts, resulting in new lines of philosophical thinking within the discipline. This includes cultural differences, plasticity, and open dynamic systems. It ends with a call for further philosophical inquiry in this emerging intersection.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neurophilia: Guiding Educational Research and the Educational Field?Paul Smeyers - 2016 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 50 (1):62-75.
The Next frontier – Neuroscience of Education.Adriana Braescu - 2014 - Postmodern Openings 5 (4):101-109.
What Can Neuroscience Bring to Education?Michel Ferrari - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):31-36.
Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience.Dennis Michael Patterson & Michael S. Pardo (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.
Can Neuroscience and Education Bridge the ‘Is-Ought’ Gap?John Clark - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 50:33-37.
Philosophy, Neuroscience and Education.John Clark - 2015 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (1):36-46.
Education Policy, Research and Neuroscience: The Final Solution?Derek Sankey - 2008 - Australian Journal of Teacher Education 33 (3):31-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
1 (#1,891,468)

6 months
1 (#1,506,218)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references