The myth of the moral faculty: Response to Kirkby

Philosophical Psychology 27 (4):483-487 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The myth of the moral faculty: Response to Kirkby.Mark Johnson - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology (4):1-5.
Why there might be a moral faculty: A reply to Johnson.David Kirkby - 2014 - Philosophical Psychology 27 (4):475-482.
There is no moral faculty.Mark Johnson - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (3):409 - 432.
Does Humanity Share a Common Moral Faculty? Smith - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):37-53.
Bishop Butler's View of Conscience.D. Daiches Raphael - 1949 - Philosophy 24 (90):219-238.
Moral knowledge by perception.Sarah McGrath - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):209–228.
Reid on the moral sense.Rebecca Copenhaver - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (S1):80-101.
Measuring Nurses' Moral Reasoning.Kathleen Oberle - 1995 - Nursing Ethics 2 (4):303-313.
Universal moral grammar: a critical appraisal.Pierre Jacob & Emmanuel Dupoux - 2007 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (9):373-378.
Reid's Response to Hume's Moral Critique of Religion.Esther Engels Kroeker - 2016 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 14 (1):85-100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-01

Downloads
11 (#1,130,421)

6 months
4 (#779,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

There is no moral faculty.Mark Johnson - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (3):409 - 432.
Why there might be a moral faculty: A reply to Johnson.David Kirkby - 2014 - Philosophical Psychology 27 (4):475-482.

Add more references