Anselm's Equivocation

Abstract

This is an explanation and critique of Anselm's most well-known argument for God's existence.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.5281/zenodo.3575251

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Anselm’s Equivocation.David A. Truncellito - 2004 - Philo 7 (1):47-56.
Anselm’s Equivocation.David A. Truncellito - 2004 - Philo 7 (1):47-56.
In Defense of Anselm.Mark Owen Webb - 2005 - Philo 8 (1):55-58.
In Defense of Anselm.Mark Owen Webb - 2005 - Philo 8 (1):55-58.
St. Anselm’s Argument.M. J. Charlesworth - 2019 - In Peter Wong, Sherah Bloor, Patrick Hutchings & Purushottama Bilimoria (eds.), Considering Religions, Rights and Bioethics: For Max Charlesworth. Springer Verlag. pp. 105-114.
Anselm and the ontological argument.Graham Oppy - 2011 - In Jeff Jordan (ed.), Philosophy of Religion: The Key Thinkers. London: Continuum. pp. 22-43.
The Ontological Argument.Sara L. Uckelman - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 25–27.
Anselm's Sleight-of-Hand: A Brief Deconstruction of Anselm's Ontological Argument.Richard Oxenberg - manuscript
Understanding Anselm's Ontological Argument.Guy Jackson - 2023 - Springer Nature Switzerland.
Conceptual Argument on God’s Existence According to Anselm and Isfahānī.Mohammad Ebrāhimi Rād - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 7 (27):115-129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-05

Downloads
15 (#975,816)

6 months
1 (#1,516,021)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references