A criticism of D. Bidney's "Spinoza and Whitehead"

Philosophical Review 47 (4):410-414 (1938)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2180997

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Henry E. Allison, "An Introduction to the Philosophy of Spinoza.". [REVIEW]Nathaniel Goldberg - 2022 - Philosophy in Review 42 (3):1-3.
The analytic and the synthetic: A tenable "dualism".Arnold S. Kaufman - 1953 - Philosophical Review 62 (3):421-426.
The problem of substance in Spinoza and Whitehead.D. Bidney - 1936 - Philosophical Review 45 (6):574-592.
Review of "Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality". [REVIEW]Allen Hazen - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (3):474-476.
Consciousness.Willem A. Devries - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (2):263.
Paul Ricoeur: "The Rule of Metaphor". [REVIEW]Harrison Hall - 1980 - Philosophical Review 89 (1):117-121.
``Ockhamism".John Martin Fischer - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (1):81-100.
``Freedom and Foreknowledge".John Martin Fischer - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (1):67-79.
``Who, Me?".Steven E. Boër & William G. Lycan - 1980 - Philosophical Review 89 (3):427-466.
Review of Dale Jamieson, "Morality's Progress: Essays on Humans, Other Animals, and the Rest of Nature". [REVIEW]Gary L. Comstock - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (3):416-419.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
15 (#244,896)

6 months
55 (#281,625)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references