Rubbish as a Consequence of the Ever More Refined Industrialization

Theory, Culture and Society 28 (7-8):354-357 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues that neither the city nor the commodity is ultimately responsible for rubbish, but rather industrialization: rubbish is a consequence, an evil effect, of industrialization, which aims to produce anything but nature, which is considered rough and tough, and therefore needs to be refined out.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Rubbish.Wang Min’an - 2011 - Theory, Culture and Society 28 (7-8):340-353.
Rubbish from the Agora.B. A. Sparkes - 1993 - The Classical Review 43 (02):371-.
The Tractatus is not all rubbish.Geach Peter Thomas - 2006 - Analysis 66 (2):172-172.
Rubbish, the Remnant, Etcetera.Couze Venn - 2006 - Theory, Culture and Society 23 (2-3):44-46.
Rubbish! The archaeology of garbage.Paul R. Mullins - 2002 - Ethics, Place and Environment 5 (3):288 – 290.
So-far incompatibilism and the so-far consequence argument.Stephen Hetherington - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):163-178.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
11 (#1,117,383)

6 months
2 (#1,229,212)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references