Why Alternative Medicine Can Be Scientifically Evaluated

In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 305 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The validity of clinical trials for certain alternative treatments has been called into question by supporters of unconventional and pseudoscientific practices, who criticize the way their beliefs are investigated scientifically or the verdicts reached by science. This chapter focuses on the following basic question: what treatments can be scientifically investigated at all? It aims to provide a better understanding of what conditions medical treatments must fulfill to be eligible for scientific investigation. In particular, the discussion is a rejoinder to the claims put forward by adherents of alternative medicine that their treatments are inaccessible to scientific scrutiny.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Pluralist Challenge to 'Integrative Medicine': Feyerabend and Popper on the Cognitive Value of Alternative Medicine.Ian Kidd - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (3):392–400.
No Remedy for Homeopathy "Research".David Shaw - 2012 - Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies 17 (4):209-10.
Philosophy of medicine in the netherlands.Henk Have & Arie Arend - 1985 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 6 (1).
Reflexive biomedicalization and alternative healing systems.Stephen Lyng - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1):53-69.
Human Nature in a Post-essentialist World.Grant Ramsey - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):983-993.
Biological dynamic farming — an occult form of alternative agriculture?Holger Kirchmann - 1994 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 7 (2):173-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-30

Downloads
79 (#211,093)

6 months
2 (#1,198,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Experiments: Why and How?Sven Ove Hansson - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):613-632.
What’s in a gold standard? In defence of randomised controlled trials.Marius Backmann - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (4):513-523.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references