The Kac Ring or the Art of Making Idealisations

Foundations of Physics 50 (10):1152-1170 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1959, mathematician Mark Kac introduced a model, called the Kac ring, in order to elucidate the classical solution of Boltzmann to the problem of macroscopic irreversibility. However, the model is far from being a realistic representation of something. How can it be of any help here? In philosophy of science, it is often argued that models can provide explanations of the phenomenon they are said to approximate, in virtue of the truth they contain, and in spite of the idealisations they are made of. On this view, idealisations are not supposed to contribute to any explaining, and should not affect the global representational function of the model. But the Kac ring is a toy model that is only made of idealisations, and is still used trustworthily to understand the treatment of irreversible phenomena in statistical mechanics. In the paper, my aim is to argue that each idealisation ingeniously designed by the mathematician maintains the representational function of the Kac ring with the general properties of macroscopic irreversibility under scrutiny. Such an active role of idealisations in the representing has so far been overlooked and reflects the art of modelling.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,362

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Talk about toy models.Joshua Luczak - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 57:1-7.
A Toy Model for Quantum Mechanics.S. J. van Enk - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (10):1447-1460.
Erratum.[author unknown] - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (6):1023-1025.
Announcement.[author unknown] - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (1):177-178.
Erratum.[author unknown] - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (6):1027-1027.
Announcements.[author unknown] - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (4):651-653.
Corrigenda.[author unknown] - 2002 - Foundations of Physics 32 (11):1803-1803.
Announcements.[author unknown] - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (3):499-501.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-07

Downloads
25 (#751,158)

6 months
10 (#299,424)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julie Jebeile
University of Bern

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation.Michael Strevens - 2008 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Models and Analogies in Science.Mary B. Hesse - 1963 - [Notre Dame, Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press.
Models and Analogies in Science.Mary Hesse - 1965 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (62):161-163.

View all 30 references / Add more references