Austin's Epistemology and His Critics

Philosophy 39 (148):163 - 165 (1964)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0031819100055443

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Has Austin refuted the sense-datum theory?A. J. Ayer - 1967 - Synthese 17 (1):117-140.
The Austin-Malcolm argument for the incorrigibility of perceptual reports.Gerald Doppelt - 1979 - Dialectica 33 (1):59-75.
Austin on perception.W. F. R. Hardie - 1963 - Philosophy 38 (July):253-263.
Austin and the argument from illusion.Roderick Firth - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (July):372-382.
Austin on incorrigibility.John E. Atwell - 1966 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (December):261-266.
Austin on some problems of perception.Jack Pustilnik - 1965 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):18-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
15 (#942,606)

6 months
10 (#262,545)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Austin on perception.W. F. R. Hardie - 1963 - Philosophy 38 (July):253-263.
Sense and Sensibilia.Roy Harrod - 1963 - Philosophy 38 (145):227 - 241.

Add more references