Innate talents: A psychological tautology?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):419-419 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The tautological implications of “innate talents” are outlined. Analogies are drawn between the present review and the nature–nurture controversies of 40 years ago. Ferguson 's theoretical positions are proposed as a context in which to consider present and future attempts to resolve this long-standing issue

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What can we learn from highly developed special skills?Michael Rutter - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):422-423.
Natural born talents undiscovered.Michael J. A. Howe, Jane W. Davidson & John A. Sloboda - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):432-437.
Innate talents: Reality or myth?Michael J. A. Howe, Jane W. Davidson & John A. Sloboda - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):399-407.
Innate Ideas.Stephen P. Stich (ed.) - 1975 - Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.
Shifting Frames: From Divided to Distributed Psychologies of Scientific Agents.Peter J. Taylor - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:304-310.
Innate ideas.Paul M. Pietroski & Stephen Crain - 2005 - In James A. McGilvray (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 164--181.
Talent scouts, not practice scouts: Talents are real.David C. Rowe - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):421-422.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
14 (#974,810)

6 months
2 (#1,221,975)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references