Intimacy: The Core of Privacy

In Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation. New York, US: OUP Usa (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why do we have a privacy interest in making our own decisions about who we kiss or to whom we show our diaries? If these decisions are private because they are intimate, then our new question is clear: what constitutes an intimate decision? In this chapter, I argue that things are intimate when they draw their meaning from someone's love, liking, or care.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/0195104609.003.0006

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Personhood or Close Relationships? The Value of Privacy.Julie C. Inness - 1992 - In Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation. New York, US: OUP Usa.
A Response to Some Philosophical Questions About Privacy.Julie Carolyn Inness - 1989 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Information, Access, or Intimate Decisions About Our Actions? The Content of Privacy.Julie C. Inness - 1992 - In Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation. New York, US: OUP Usa.
Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation.Julie C. Inness - 1992 - New York, US: OUP Usa.
Disentangling Privacy and Intimacy: Intimate Citizenship, Private Boundaries and Public Transgressions.Paul Reynolds - 2010 - Human Affairs 20 (1):33-42.
Introduction: The Chaotic World of Privacy.Julie C. Inness - 1992 - In Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation. New York, US: OUP Usa.
What is Intimacy?Jasmine Gunkel - forthcoming - Journal of Philosophy.
Digital Self-Defence: Why you Ought to Preserve Your Privacy for the Sake of Wrongdoers.Lauritz Aastrup Munch - 2022 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25 (2):233-248.
The Threatened Downfall of Privacy: Judith Jarvis Thomson's “The Right to Privacy” and Skepticism About Privacy.Julie C. Inness - 1992 - In Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation. New York, US: OUP Usa.
The Morality of Intimate Faculty-Student Relationships.Nicholas Dixon - 1996 - The Monist 79 (4):519-535.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references