Book Review: Science of Science and Reflexivity [Book Review]

European Journal of Social Theory 8 (3):375-379 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/1368431005054800

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Book Review: Science of Science and Reflexivity. [REVIEW]Theodore Schatzki - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4):496-499.
Ideational Reflexivity in Economic Systems.Lauchlan Mackinnon - 2006 - Dissertation, The University of Queensland
Science of science and reflexivity.Pierre Bourdieu - 2004 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Richard Nice.
Toward a More Democratic Science.Nancy Arden Mchugh - 2000 - Dissertation, Temple University
Essay Review: Science and Poetry: A Book of Science VerseA Book of Science Verse. Selected by EastwoodW. . Pp. 279. 21s.Donald Davie - 1962 - History of Science 1 (1):100-102.
Two Models of Social Science Research Ethics Review.Sean L. M. Jennings - 2010 - Research Ethics 6 (3):86-90.
Social epistemology and reflexivity: Two versions of how to be really useful. [REVIEW]Malcolm Ashmore - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (2):157-161.
Science in vivo.Sergei P. Schavelev - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):236-241.
Keller on Science Studies, or Reflexivity Revisited.Arie Rip - 1988 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 13 (3-4):254-261.
Introduction to symposium on ‘reflexivity and economics: George Soros's theory of reflexivity and the methodology of economic science’.D. Wade Hands - 2013 - Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (4):303-308.
Soros and Popper: on fallibility, reflexivity, and the unity of method.Mark Amadeus Notturno - 2013 - Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (4):420-428.
Marxism and Philosophy of Science.Valentin A. Bazhanov & Elena V. Kudryashova - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (3):211-217.
Book Review: Cogent Science in Context: The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory, and HabermasRehgWilliamCogent Science in Context: The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory, and HabermasCambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2009. 360 pp. $40. [REVIEW]K. Brad Wray - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (1):152-154.
AI and representation: A study of a rhetorical context for legitimacy. [REVIEW]Lynette A. C. Hunter - 1993 - AI and Society 7 (3):185-207.
Science as Reflective Practice: A Review of Frederick Grinnell's Book, Everyday Practice of Science. [REVIEW]D. P. Dash - 2009 - Journal of Research Practice 5 (1):Article R1.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-25

Downloads
5 (#1,514,558)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

NORMATİF BİLİMİN İMKÂNLARI.Abdulkadir Öncel, Özlem Kuyu & Ramazan Ertel - 2020 - Özne Felsefe Dergisi 1 (33):85-110.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references