The Principles of Democracy: A Conceptual Framework for Leveraging Democratic Polarities

Agpe the Royal Gondwana Research Journal of History, Science, Economic, Political and Social Science 4 (7):1-12 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The polarities of democracy framework is used to achieve human emancipation by simultaneously managing multiple paradoxes by employing Johnson’s polarity management as the conceptual framework. Although Johnson’s framework may be appropriate for managing other tension-dependent pairs, it is less suitable for managing multiple democratic values when the goal is human emancipation and sustainable democratic social change. Managing multiple polarities is exacerbated by the problem-shifting and problem-creation effect inherent in a tension-driven framework. The aim was to develop a constructivist grounded theory to answer the research question: How can the first principles of democracy be used to reduce dynamic tension and achieve human emancipation? This gap has been filled by a parsimonious conceptual framework based on three democratic principles: human dignity, fairness, and knowledge. The principles of democracy conceptual framework can synthesize the tension between democratic values in order to manage, plan, and evaluate democratic social change initiatives.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Empowering Democracy: A Socio-Ethical Theory.Angelina Inesia-Forde - 2023 - Asian Journal of Basic Science and Research 5 (3):1-20.
Democracy’s Value: A Conceptual Map.Elena Ziliotti - 2020 - Journal of Value Inquiry 54 (3):407-427.
Towards an African Theory of Democracy.A. K. Fayemi - 2009 - Thought and Practice: A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya 1 (1):101-126.
Towards an African Theory of Democracy.Ademola Kazeem Fayemi - 2009 - Thought and Practice: A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya 1 (1):101-126.
A Case for Global Democracy? Arms Exports and Conflicting Goals in Democracy Promotion.Pavel Dufek & Michal Mochťak - 2019 - Journal of International Relations and Development 22 (3):610–639.
In our name: the ethics of democracy.Eric Anthony Beerbohm - 2012 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Four Dimensions of Democracy.Michael S. Perry - 2015 - Essays in Philosophy 16 (1):3-25.
EU democracy and e-democracy: can the two be reconciled?Fernando Mendez - 2012 - In Garcia David, Mendez Fernando, Serdült Uwe & Schweitzer Frank (eds.).
Between the simulation and the consolidation of democratic institutions.V. Pashchenko - 2016 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 2:19-28.
Mitigated Democracy.Jasper Doomen - 2016 - Archiv Für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosphie 102 (2):278-294.
The Supposed Right to a Democratic Say.Richard J. Arneson - 2009 - In Thomas Christiano & John Christman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 195–212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-15

Downloads
132 (#137,851)

6 months
88 (#53,213)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reconceptualizing American Democracy: The First Principles.Angelina Inesia-Forde - 2023 - Asian Journal of Basic Science and Research 5 (4):01-47.
AI-Assisted Formal Marketing Theory.Angelina Inesia Forde - forthcoming - Asian Journal of Basic Science and Research.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references