Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 13 (3-4):307-317 (2019)
AbstractGiven Bernard Suits’ stature in the philosophy of sport, his take on strategic fouling, surprisingly, hasn’t been given much attention in the literature. Rather than relying on a purely empirical or ‘ethos’ approach to justify the Strategic Foul he provides a mixed justification. Suits’ account combines a priori and a posteriori elements. He introduces a third kind of rule, which appears to be unlike rules of skill or constitutive rules, into his conceptual scheme. Suits claims that it is sometimes tactically correct to break such a rule in order to gain an advantage. I will argue that the a priori element in his justification of strategic fouling is unconvincing because there is nothing special about ‘third type’ rule-violations, which incur a ‘fixed penalty’. Furthermore, the a posteriori element ultimately reduces to a rule of skill, and it is doubtful whether it has sufficient normative force to warrant breaking a rule. But, most importantly, the a posteriori element degrades the power of the a priori element.
Similar books and articles
Strategic Fouling and Sport as Play.J. S. Russell - 2017 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 11 (1):26-39.
The Ethics of Strategic Fouling: A Reply to Fraleigh.Robert L. Simon - 2005 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 32 (1):87-95.
The Ethics of Strategic Fouling.Robert L. Simon - 2007 - In William J. Morgan (ed.), Ethics in Sport. Human Kinetics. pp. 219.
A Grasshopperian Analysis Of The Strategic Foul.Deborah P. Vossen - 2014 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 41 (3):325-346.
Game as Paradox: A Rebuttal of Suits.David Myers - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (1):155-168.
A Kantian View of Suits’ Utopia: ‘A Kingdom of Autotelically-Motivated Game Players’.Francisco Javier Lopez Frias - 2017 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 44 (1):138-151.
Bernard Suits on Capacities: Games, Perfectionism, and Utopia.Christopher C. Yorke - 2018 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 45 (2):177-188.
The Strategic Foul and Contract Law: Efficient Breach in Sports?Miroslav Imbrisevic - 2018 - Fair Play 12:69-99.
Endless Summer: What Kinds of Games Will Suits’ Utopians Play?Christopher C. Yorke - 2017 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 44 (2):213-228.
Suits, Autotelicity, Temporal Reallocations, Game Resources and Defining 'Play'.Richard Royce - 2011 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (2):93 - 109.
Intermittency as a Tool for Minimization of Membrane Fouling.S. S. Madaeni - forthcoming - Scientia.
Strategic Maneuvering: A Synthetic Recapitulation. [REVIEW]Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):381-392.
The Grasshopper - Third Edition: Games, Life and Utopia.Bernard Suits, Thomas Hurka & Frank Newfeld - 2014 - Broadview Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Paying to Break the Rules: Compensation, Restitution and the Strategic Foul.Miroslav Imbrisevic - 2020 - FairPlay 18:44-72.
‘A Vision of Paradise Lost’: Coaching as a Grasshopper Rather Than an Ant.Michael Burke - 2021 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 49 (1):52-67.
References found in this work
Tricky Triad: Games, Play, and Sport.Bernard Suits - 1988 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 15 (1):1-9.
Are Rules All an Umpire Has to Work With?J. S. Russell - 1999 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 26 (1):27-49.
The Logical Incompatibility Thesis and Rules: A Reconsideration of Formalism as an Account of Games.William J. Morgan - 1987 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 14 (1):1-20.