The Canary Tree Revisited

&
Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1677-1694 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We generalize the result of Mekler and Shelah [3] that the existence of a canary tree is independent of ZFC + GCH to uncountable regular cardinals. We also correct an error from the original proof.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Canary tree revisited.Tapani Hyttinen & Mika Rautila - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1677-1694.
Uncountable superperfect forcing and minimality.Elizabeth Theta Brown & Marcia J. Groszek - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 144 (1-3):73-82.
Essential Kurepa trees versus essential Jech–Kunen trees.Renling Jin & Saharon Shelah - 1994 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 69 (1):107-131.
The tree property and the failure of SCH at uncountable cofinality.Dima Sinapova - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):553-562.
Cellularity of Pseudo-Tree Algebras.Jennifer Brown - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (3):353-359.
Definition 1.1. 1. A tree is a subset T of< such that for all∈ T, if∈< and⊆, then∈ T. 2. If T is a tree and S⊆ T is also a tree, we say that S is a subtree of T. 3. A tree T is bounded if there exists h:→ such that for all∈ T. [REVIEW]Joseph R. Mileti - 2005 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11 (3).
Fragility and indestructibility of the tree property.Spencer Unger - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):635-645.
A remark on the tree property in a choiceless context.Arthur W. Apter - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (5-6):585-590.
Aronszajn trees and the successors of a singular cardinal.Spencer Unger - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):483-496.
Trees, fundamental groups and homology groups.Katsuya Eda & Masasi Higasikawa - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 111 (3):185-201.
Borel partitions of infinite subtrees of a perfect tree.A. Louveau, S. Shelah & B. Veličković - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 63 (3):271-281.
Review: Uri Abraham, Aronszajn Trees on $mathscr{N}2$ and $mathscr{N}3$; James Cummings, Matthew Foreman, The Tree Property; Menachem Magidor, Saharon Shelah, The Tree Property at Successors of Singular Cardinals. [REVIEW]Arthur W. Apter - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (2):283-285.
Relating word and tree automata.Orna Kupferman, Shmuel Safra & Moshe Y. Vardi - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 138 (1):126-146.
Borel partitions of infinite subtrees of a perfect tree.A. Louveau, S. Shelah & B. Velikovi - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 63 (3):271-281.
Cellularity and the Structure of Pseudo-Trees.Jennifer Brown - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (4):1093 - 1107.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
2 (#1,809,554)

6 months
2 (#1,206,551)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references